The RACWA has recently released a report on spending on cycling infrastructure and the economic benefits of cycling.  The report can be found here (summary here: here).  The report states that investment in good quality and safe cycling infrastructure returns around 3.4 times the cost of that infrastructure.  In contrast, public transport is 1.8 times and a motor vehicle is 1 times.

It simply drives home what most of us have known for a long time.  The big item there is their recommendation to maintain a rolling cycling infrastructure budget of $25M/yr (2010 dollars).  Adelaide, being a similar size, would be on the same footing.

Views: 190

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I was in WA during July last year, and used many of their cycleways, including the 68 km long dual lane cycleway from Perth to Mandurah - - though apart from that one, I still prefer riding on the road.

To start we're going to need a bit more than $25M/yr if we are to start building infrastructure according to international best practices (eg proven methods in the Netherlands). At least until the infrastructure reaches a high standard.

To put things in perspective, we're spending $800 million on the South Road/Grand Junction Road overpass!

Imagine what kind of cycling infrastructure we could have built with that money!

An option to:
-- excel (install excellent cycling infrastructure through out Adelaide that would encourage cycling and decrease road congestion plus pollution with associated health costs and climate change)
-- or do something badly (improve for drivers a very short section of a long road, then drivers complain).

And what did the govt choose?


Support our Sponsors

© 2020   Created by Gus.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service