USADA give it a rest there is no evidence (worthy of the name) against Lance Armstrong!
LET IT GO!
It sure is taking an awful long time and alot of tax payer's money to nail Mr Armstrong.
We shall see. If the USADA fails to nail LA then I wonder who'll be next in line to have a go?
World Health organistation - cause this is giving everyone the sh#ts, The Ponds Institute?
I think that might very well be the point of this latest 'farce'. With LA winning (again) makes them look like fools (which they are) !
8 year statute of limtations?
I think this might mean that his TDF victories 1999-2005 will be safe, which will save a lot of face for the UCI. Then again with a USADA "conviction" the UCI might pursue him, and revoke them like they did to Riis.
Interesting chart on the Cyclingtips website. If you take the titles away from Lance who do they go to? Most of the top ten riders in each year he won have either been found guilty of doping, admitted to doping or are under an equally, if not larger, cloud of suspicion of doping.
Was wondering about that myself last night as I sat in front of the TV last knocking back a single malt.